The Whittier Conservancy pursued two lawsuits to address concerns about historic resources at Nelles. We prevailed in one and the City/Brookfield prevailed in the other. Both sides appealed and the appeals are pending. Following months of negotiation, after years of litigation and hearings, and faced with the need to file additional lawsuits regarding further project approvals if we did not settle, the Conservancy chose to add further protections to the buildings being saved and even those that aren’t, and also will be trustees for a compensatory mitigation fund. That fund is appropriate because of the loss of some of the lesser Nelles buildings if the development goes forward. Hundreds of thousands of dollars will be available to protect important Whittier resources, and the Conservancy hopes to work with the city cooperatively after years of conflict on the Nelles issue.
for immediate release
The Whittier Conservancy, Brookfield Residential, and The City of Whittier Agree to a Global Settlement Allowing Brookfield's Planned Development at Nelles to Proceed
Mary Gorman-Sullens, President, Whittier Conservancy, (562) 644-4882
Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney, 714-624-8300
David Bartlett, Brookfield Residential, 714-329-3203
Whittier, October 24, 2017. At the October 24, 2017 City Council meeting, the City of Whittier announced that the City, the Whittier Conservancy, and Brookfield Residential have reached a global settlement regarding the City’s approval of the mixed-use project at the former Fred C. Nelles Youth Correctional Facility. “This is a great day for the City and the City’s residents,” said Councilmember Bob Henderson. “The settlement agreement provides enhanced protection for historic resources on site and at the same time clears the path for Brookfield to implement the City’s unanimously-approved development plan for the Nelles site,” continued Councilmember Henderson.
Brookfield’s redevelopment plan for Nelles includes up to 208,000 square feet of retail, 750 residential units, and a development agreement that provides assurances the City will receive $1,000,000 in annual net tax revenues from the project. Following the City’s approval of the project in 2015, the Whittier Conservancy filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court alleging that the City’s environmental impact report (EIR) was inadequate. After the Los Angeles County Superior Court upheld the EIR, the Conservancy filed an appeal.
The parties’ comprehensive settlement agreement provides for the dismissal of the Conservancy’s appeal and will effectively end litigation between the Conservancy and the City and Brookfield regarding the Nelles development. The parties jointly praised Councilmember Bob Henderson saying, “Thanks to Councilmember Bob Henderson for working tirelessly for several months to bring this negotiation to a successful conclusion.”
“We are pleased to reach a global settlement on the project,” said Helen Rahder, Executive Director of the Whittier Conservancy. The Conservancy’s president Mary Gorman-Sullens added that “the Conservancy looks forward to an ongoing cooperative relationship with the City in protecting historic resources.”
Brookfield’s chief development executive, David Bartlett, also praised the settlement. “We look forward to working with the City, the City’s residents, and with the Whittier Conservancy to deliver a best-in-class mixed-use community that pays appropriate respect to the historic resources on site and delivers a vibrant residential and retail development. The City’s residents deserve the fruits of what has been a multi-decade, collaborative effort to redevelop the now-closed Nelles correctional facility.”
for immediate release
Whittier Conservancy Wins Court Case, Judge Voids Sale of Historic Landmark Fred C. Nelles Site for Violation of Environmental Laws
Contact: Ted Snyder, President, Whittier Conservancy (562) 692-7066
Susan Brandt-Hawley, attorney (707) 732-0007 firstname.lastname@example.org
Whittier, July 13, 2016. On July 31, 2015 the The Whittier Conservancy won the primary issue in its public‐interest lawsuit filed one year ago against the State of California. The Conservancy successfully enforced the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to protect the former Fred C. Nelles Youth Correctional Facility (“Nelles”), California Historic Landmark No. 947.
The Conservancy’s suit against state agencies was filed in Alameda County where the Attorney General maintains offices. The Alameda County Superior Court ruled yesterday afternoon, July 12, that the extension of the Nelles escrow must be set aside due to failure to consider and mitigate environmental impacts.
Judge Frank Roesch ruled that the state agencies failed as required to comply with CEQA chapters 1 and 2, to “identify and consider the environmental impacts of their decisions and to explore feasible alternatives and mitigation measures prior to approving the sale of property to, for example, a buyer intent on the demolition of historic resources… even if they are not required to prepare an EIR.”
The Conservancy’s preservation attorney Susan Brandt-Hawley explained that “the escrow for the state’s 2011 sale of the Nelles landmark site to Brookfield Residential has an expiration date of March 2015. When Brookfield did not meet required conditions, the state extended the escrow to March 2017. However, that extension – and the sale – are now void because the state failed to comply with CEQA approving the extension.” The Conservancy had requested that the state condition the escrow extension on Brookfield’s protection of the Nelles landmark buildings.
Brandt-Hawley stated: “CEQA has 6 chapters. The Legislature exempts sales of California surplus properties from chapters 3‐6. However, such sales must still comply with Chapters 1 and 2. The Court ruled that the state agencies violated CEQA when they extended the Brookfield escrow without any attempt to comply. The California Supreme Court has ruled that CEQA’s first two chapters require agencies to consider and mitigate environmental impacts before making discretionary land use decisions.”Conservancy President Ted Snyder expressed the Conservancy members’ reactions to the ruling. “We are impressed with and grateful for the Court’s carefully‐reasoned decision. On behalf of the citizens of the state and the city, Conservancy representatives appeared before the state agencies last year. We requested the state’s compliance with CEQA to protect the Nelles landmark before extending the escrow.”
Conservancy Executive Director Helen Rahder explained further that "it would have been appropriate for the state to require Brookfield to incorporate the historic resources, which encompass fewer than 3 of 75 acres on the Nelles site, into any new development. Yet this was not considered despite Brookfield’s known plan to cause the imminent loss of landmark status through needless demolition. Our lawsuit was a last resort."
Now that the Nelles escrow has expired, the state agencies must follow statutory procedures before entering into any new purchase and sale contract with Brookfield or any other buyer that may now come forward.
This will require consideration of affordable housing options, current market price, and adaptive reuse of the historic Nelles buildings. The Conservancy has suggested how the site could be designed around the landmark buildings in a unique, sustainable, pedestrian‐friendly, inter‐generational, transit‐oriented community where residents can work, shop and play where they live.
for immediate release
Whittier Conservancy Sues City of Whittier
Contact: Helen Rahder, Executive Director, Whittier Conservancy
Whittier, Aug 1, 2015. On July 31, 2015 the Whittier conservancy filed suit against the City of Whittier to enforce mandatory state laws that protect the former Fred C. Nelles Youth Correctional Facility (“Nelles”), California Historic Landmark No. 947. Founded in 1891, Nelles is the oldest juvenile facility in the state and houses historically significant resources on a 74-acre site.
The Whittier Conservancy brings this action in the public interest after the City of Whittier approved a generic mixed-use commercial and residential development that would needlessly demolish most of the historic resources at Nelles and much of its urban forest.
The Conservancy and others advocated for a sustainable project that would be unique, transit-oriented, pedestrian-friendly, inter-generational, architecturally relevant, maintain the abundance of mature trees, be consistent with the Whittier Boulevard Specific Plan Workplace District, and be respectful of the tradition and history of the community and the site itself. Adaptive reuse of the Nelles historic resources is feasible.
In approving the demolition project proposed by Brookfield Residential, the Whittier City Council instead violated the mandates of state law, local ordinances, and due process. During many years of administrative proceedings, representatives of the non-profit Conservancy — along with the California Office of Historic Preservation, the Los Angeles Conservancy, the California Preservation Foundation and hundreds of Whittier citizens — urged the City Council to act in the interests of the community to fairly consider development alternatives to reuse the ‘built environment’ of the stunning 74-acre Nelles site. The City instead bowed to Brookfield’s short-term economic demands in a convoluted series of actions accomplishing a post hoc rationalization of decisions made too soon.
The California Supreme Court instructs that such actions short of a formal, binding approval are illegally premature if they move a project’s momentum significantly forward.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is citizen-enforced. The Whittier Conservancy seeks to enforce CEQA and City ordinances that protect the landmark Nelles property, and to require due process of law.
“Over and over we warned the City Council against the actions it was taking on behalf of the applicant’s plans for Nelles,” said Ted Snyder, President of the Conservancy. “And each time the council was assured by city staff and consultants that their actions were legal and their environmental documents adequate. We believe those assurances were unwarranted and the Council’s reliance upon them unwise.”
“Also, on multiple occasions we met with the proposed developer and the city to offer solutions, but ultimately the city was unsupportive and the developer unresponsive. So now we seek to have these issues decided in a more impartial and objective forum,” said Snyder.
“We simply cannot sit on the sidelines and watch a golden opportunity squandered on a project that causes such significant environmental impacts and offers so little benefit to the community,” Snyder continued. “The Council approved a plan that provides no public open space, no affordable housing, no playing fields for youth, no continuum of care facility for seniors, no venue for the arts, no unique retail component: in short, nothing that this community really needs. Meanwhile, it will cause significant adverse impacts to traffic, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and will needlessly destroy a majority of the Nelles site’s irreplaceable historic resources. This legal action is only part of our efforts to ensure a better project for the people of this community.”